I’m in the midst of skipping thru this excellent report of a failed wiki-implementation. Lots of practical insights and some open issues. For instance if it is useful to have wiki-pages (in corporate setting, intranets) that allow anonymous comments. The pros account for having a higher rate of contribution where evaluation apprehension is high on the downside is the rupture of the wiki-model. Although having comments somehow disrupts the wiki-model anyway. Obviously a mixture of shared and owned content and even anonymous content blend in well the different modes of working together.
No tag for this post.
Comments are closed | Permalink •
•




