Comments on: ZiB2 http://randgaenge.net/2006/zib2/2121/ thomas n. burg - on social media and its benefits for us, and sometimes gossip. Fri, 15 May 2009 06:20:30 +0000 hourly 1 By: Thomas N. Burg http://randgaenge.net/2006/zib2/2121/comment-page-1/#comment-10 Thomas N. Burg Mon, 06 Mar 2006 10:25:02 +0000 http://randgaenge.net/2006/03/03/zib2/#comment-10 Should work now: this is the better one http://blog.slaven.net.au/wordpress-plugins/wordpress-feed-locations-plugin/ Should work now: this is the better one http://blog.slaven.net.au/wordpress-plugins/wordpress-feed-locations-plugin/

]]> By: Thomas N. Burg http://randgaenge.net/2006/zib2/2121/comment-page-1/#comment-9 Thomas N. Burg Mon, 06 Mar 2006 10:18:06 +0000 http://randgaenge.net/2006/03/03/zib2/#comment-9 Danke, liegt am Feedburner-Plugin Danke, liegt am Feedburner-Plugin

]]> By: mo. http://randgaenge.net/2006/zib2/2121/comment-page-1/#comment-8 mo. Mon, 06 Mar 2006 10:10:09 +0000 http://randgaenge.net/2006/03/03/zib2/#comment-8 dein feed unter http://randgaenge.net/feed/ funktioniert leider nicht. liebe grüße, mo. dein feed unter

http://randgaenge.net/feed/

funktioniert leider nicht. liebe grüße, mo.

]]> By: Thomas N. Burg http://randgaenge.net/2006/zib2/2121/comment-page-1/#comment-7 Thomas N. Burg Fri, 03 Mar 2006 12:07:51 +0000 http://randgaenge.net/2006/03/03/zib2/#comment-7 Thanks for your comment. Nothing to add you are right. The more general question, however, is: how do the political parties conceive of the web? I think they see the web as just another broadcasting media. and, of course, the web is far more than broadcasting. @Wallström: you need to ask the journalist, she said that ;-). On the other hand: a weblog offers the opportunity to build relationships - the opportunity not more. Thanks for your comment. Nothing to add you are right.
The more general question, however, is: how do the political parties conceive of the web? I think they see the web as just another broadcasting media. and, of course, the web is far more than broadcasting.

@Wallström: you need to ask the journalist, she said that ;-) .
On the other hand: a weblog offers the opportunity to build relationships – the opportunity not more.

]]> By: Roland Vidmar http://randgaenge.net/2006/zib2/2121/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Roland Vidmar Fri, 03 Mar 2006 10:34:51 +0000 http://randgaenge.net/2006/03/03/zib2/#comment-6 Will, I'm not sure too... it was combined with usage of the Alexa-Ranking to analyze sites of political parties and their quality. In times of elections the political parties of course use weblogs, podcasts and stuff like that, but tell me one thing... who built a relationship to Margot Wallström? I mean, there were blogs at the presidential election and there were blogs, podcasts, communities during the pre-elective months in vienna (last autumn)... they already use the tools, but blogging is not the solution for political parties imho. It's much more campaigning, getting together and recruiting-actions than simple blogging as we saw in the u. s. presidential elections... Will, I’m not sure too… it was combined with usage of the Alexa-Ranking to analyze sites of political parties and their quality. In times of elections the political parties of course use weblogs, podcasts and stuff like that, but tell me one thing… who built a relationship to Margot Wallström?

I mean, there were blogs at the presidential election and there were blogs, podcasts, communities during the pre-elective months in vienna (last autumn)… they already use the tools, but blogging is not the solution for political parties imho. It’s much more campaigning, getting together and recruiting-actions than simple blogging as we saw in the u. s. presidential elections…

]]>