I don’t get Tom Davenport. First he somehow discards the concepts of [tag-tec]Enterprise 2.0[/tag-tec] only to reanimate them as a counter-strategy (there are new technologies - see below) to [tag-tec]crowdsourcing[/tag-tec] yet another Enterprise 2.0 concept. I’d say that the debate of terms and definitions should give way to a more phenomenological approach, i.e. create and describe cases - don’t talk to much about the labels.
Sourcing the In-Crowd: “[...] this alternative ‘in-crowdsourcing,’ and we both believe that it should take off. There are new technologies to make it easier to solicit and monitor the ideas of your most thoughtful employees, no matter what their job titles. Of course, the part that the technology supports is the easy part (as compared to evaluating and implementing the ideas), but that’s the subject for another post. However, I’m placing a public bet that in-crowdsourcing, [tag-ice]idea management[/tag-ice]—or whatever you want to call it—is poised to give crowdsourcing a viable opponent. To which group would you turn first for new ideas: the out-crowd or the in-crowd?”
Related posts
Tags: Business, Enterprise 2.0, Social Software
Comments are closed | Permalink • 
• 
